Create an AI-powered white paper from research to designed PDF in 48 hours

Create an editorial brief for a research-backed white paper.

Topic:
{{topic}}

Primary reader:
{{primary_reader}}

Decision the reader needs to make:
{{reader_decision}}

Our point of view:
{{point_of_view}}

Approved internal proof:
{{internal_proof}}

CTA:
{{cta}}

Claims that need external evidence:
{{claims_needing_evidence}}

Return:
1. Reader situation
2. Core problem
3. Recommended thesis
4. Three supporting arguments
5. Scope and exclusions
6. Evidence required for each argument
7. Recommended CTA
8. Claims that must not appear without verification
9. Review questions for the subject matter expert

Do not invent statistics, customer outcomes, or market claims. Mark missing information as NEEDS INPUT. A human owner must approve the thesis and evidence boundary before research starts.

Research one argument for a B2B white paper.

White paper thesis:
{{white_paper_thesis}}

Argument to support:
{{argument}}

Audience and industry:
{{audience_and_industry}}

Date boundary:
{{date_boundary}}

Find current, credible evidence and return a table with:
1. Claim supported
2. Source title
3. Publisher or institution
4. Author, if available
5. Publication date
6. Source URL
7. Evidence summary
8. Whether the source is primary or secondary
9. Important limitation or counterpoint
10. Recommended use in the paper

Prioritize official data, peer-reviewed research, standards bodies, and original surveys. Do not cite a secondary article when the original source is available. Do not fabricate a statistic or quote. Label weak, outdated, or conflicting evidence clearly so an editor can decide whether to use it.

Using only the sources in this notebook, build an evidence ledger for the white paper.

Approved thesis and arguments:
{{approved_thesis_and_arguments}}

For each argument, return:
1. Supported factual claims
2. Source name for each claim
3. The specific supporting passage or section
4. Relevant dates and populations
5. Limitations or caveats
6. Conflicting evidence
7. Internal examples that may illustrate but do not prove the claim
8. Questions that remain unanswered
9. Confidence: high, medium, or low

Do not use outside knowledge. Do not merge conflicting statistics. Mark any claim that lacks direct source support as UNSUPPORTED. The writer will use this ledger as the only factual basis for the first draft.

Create a section-by-section argument map for this white paper.

Editorial brief:
{{editorial_brief}}

Evidence ledger:
{{evidence_ledger}}

Internal examples:
{{internal_examples}}

Return:
1. Executive summary promise
2. Recommended section order
3. For each section:
   - reader question
   - section claim
   - evidence to use
   - counterpoint or limitation
   - example or illustration
   - section takeaway
   - transition to the next section
   - what not to repeat
4. Recommended charts, tables, or frameworks
5. Evidence gaps that block drafting
6. Subject matter expert questions

Do not create claims beyond the evidence ledger. Label any proposed section that lacks support. Keep the structure focused on helping the reader make the stated decision, not displaying all available research.

Draft this white paper section from the approved materials.

Section contract:
{{section_contract}}

Relevant evidence:
{{section_evidence}}

Previous section summary:
{{previous_section_summary}}

Brand voice:
{{brand_voice}}

Write:
1. A clear section opening
2. The argument in logical order
3. Evidence with inline source markers such as [SOURCE 3]
4. One practical example
5. The limitation or counterpoint where relevant
6. A concise section takeaway
7. A transition to the next section

Rules:
- Use only the supplied evidence
- Do not invent numbers, quotes, customer stories, or causal claims
- Distinguish fact from interpretation
- Keep internal examples anonymous unless approval is explicit
- Avoid repeated introductions and generic AI language
- Flag any missing evidence in brackets

A human editor will verify every source marker and approve the section before design.

Audit this white paper draft against the evidence ledger.

Draft:
{{white_paper_draft}}

Evidence ledger:
{{evidence_ledger}}

Return:
1. Every factual or quantitative claim
2. The source marker attached to it
3. Whether the source fully supports, partly supports, contradicts, or does not support the wording
4. Date or scope concerns
5. Recommended correction
6. Duplicate or inconsistent claims
7. Uncited statements that require evidence
8. A final list of claims a human reviewer must open and verify

Do not add new sources or repair a weak claim by guessing. Preserve nuance and limitations. Mark any unsupported claim for removal. The human reviewer will verify the source pages and approve the final wording.

Edit this approved white paper draft for clarity without changing its evidence.

Draft:
{{verified_draft}}

Brand voice:
{{brand_voice}}

Required terminology:
{{required_terminology}}

Return:
1. Revised draft
2. A list of repeated ideas removed
3. Vague or inflated phrases replaced
4. Terms or statistics made consistent
5. Sections that still feel too long
6. Any edit that could alter factual meaning and therefore needs human approval

Rules:
- Preserve source markers
- Do not add new claims, examples, or statistics
- Do not make conclusions stronger than the evidence
- Prefer direct sentences and useful headings
- Remove generic introductions and summary repetition
- Keep the intended reader and decision visible

The editor will compare the revision with the verified draft before accepting changes.

Create a design plan for this approved white paper.

Manuscript structure:
{{manuscript_structure}}

Brand guidelines:
{{brand_guidelines}}

Available charts and source data:
{{chart_data}}

Return:
1. Recommended page sequence
2. Page purpose for each page
3. Headline and callout hierarchy
4. Charts or diagrams to build
5. Exact source note required for each visual
6. Sections that should remain plain text
7. Accessibility checks for contrast, type size, and reading order
8. Final PDF QA checklist

Do not rewrite claims or create decorative statistics. Do not suggest a chart when the underlying data is incomplete. Mark any page that needs a human designer or subject matter review before export.