AI-powered podcast guest research and personalized pitch machine

Build a podcast guest qualification rubric from the information below.

Spokesperson expertise:
{{spokesperson_expertise}}

Target audience:
{{target_audience}}

Topics we can teach:
{{topic_options}}

Proof points and examples:
{{proof_points}}

Business objective:
{{business_objective}}

Hard disqualifiers:
{{disqualifiers}}

Return:
1. One recommended guest angle
2. Three supporting episode topics
3. The listener outcome for each topic
4. Must-have show criteria
5. Nice-to-have criteria
6. Disqualifiers
7. A 100-point scoring rubric with weights
8. Evidence the researcher must capture before approving a show

Do not invent credentials, audience fit, or proof. Mark any missing input as NEEDS REVIEW. A human owner will approve the angle and scoring weights before research begins.

Research this podcast as a potential guest opportunity.

Podcast:
{{podcast_name}}

Podcast URL:
{{podcast_url}}

Our target audience:
{{target_audience}}

Our proposed guest angle:
{{guest_angle}}

Use current public sources to return:
1. Host name and role
2. Current publishing cadence
3. Five recent episode themes
4. Typical guest profile
5. Evidence of audience fit
6. Topics the show has already covered heavily
7. A credible angle the host has not recently covered
8. Public guest submission or contact instructions
9. Source URL and date for every factual finding
10. Confidence level for each section

Do not estimate audience size or contact details without evidence. Write UNKNOWN where the evidence is missing. End with a fit recommendation of strong, possible, or weak and explain the decision in three sentences. A researcher will verify the sources before scoring the show.

Score these podcast opportunities using the approved rubric.

Qualification rubric:
{{qualification_rubric}}

Podcast research rows:
{{podcast_research_rows}}

For each show, return:
1. Score for every rubric category
2. Evidence used for each score
3. Total weighted score
4. Main fit strength
5. Main risk or uncertainty
6. Recommended tier: outreach now, hold, or reject
7. Best episode angle
8. Human verification needed before outreach

Rules:
- Use only evidence in the research rows
- Do not reward brand fame unless the rubric includes it
- Deduct for stale publishing, repeated coverage of our angle, or an unverified contact route
- Mark missing evidence instead of assuming it
- Keep the rationale concise enough to paste into Google Sheets

A human owner will approve the final tier and may override the model score.

Create a podcast pitch brief for one show.

Show research:
{{show_research}}

Recent relevant episodes:
{{recent_episodes}}

Host or producer:
{{contact_context}}

Guest angle:
{{guest_angle}}

Guest proof and stories:
{{guest_proof}}

Return:
1. Why this show is a fit
2. The exact editorial gap we can fill
3. One recommended episode title
4. Three talking points with listener value
5. Two stories or proof points to use
6. A reference to one recent episode and why it matters
7. Claims or wording to avoid
8. Facts the sender must verify
9. A one-sentence pitch thesis

Do not flatter the host, invent familiarity, or claim an audience size we cannot verify. If the angle overlaps heavily with a recent episode, recommend a different angle or reject the pitch. The sender will review the cited episode and all proof before outreach.

Write a concise podcast guest pitch from this approved brief.

Pitch brief:
{{pitch_brief}}

Recipient:
{{recipient_name_and_role}}

Spokesperson:
{{spokesperson_name_and_credentials}}

Approved proof:
{{approved_proof}}

Create:
1. Three subject lines
2. One primary email of 120 to 170 words
3. One shorter version under 100 words
4. A single follow-up line for seven days later

Requirements:
- Reference one verified editorial detail
- Explain the value to listeners before describing the guest
- Offer three concrete talking points
- Use a low-pressure close
- Do not use generic praise, fake familiarity, or unsupported audience claims
- Do not attach files or ask for a meeting in the first email
- Mark any fact that still needs human verification

The campaign owner will choose the version, verify the reference, and edit the final wording before send.