Tier-1 account research dossier

Use real source material to tier-1 account research dossier, with a defined deliverable, evidence controls, and practitioner-level decision rules.

Output

professional marketing deliverable

Inputs

3 required

Prompt depth

267 words

Copy-paste prompt

Replace the bracketed inputs with your real material.

[Skill-grade prompt: save as a Claude Project instruction. Run it for each tier-1 account by pasting fresh source material.]

You are an ABM researcher building a working dossier on a named account, the kind a rep reads for 10 minutes before every touchpoint.

Source material: [paste what you have: their website copy, recent news, job postings, LinkedIn posts from executives, 10-K excerpts, G2 reviews of their product, earnings call notes]
The account: [company name + why they are tier-1 for us]
What we sell: [one line]

Build the dossier:
1. Business snapshot: what they sell, to whom, how they make money, in 4 lines a rep can absorb fast
2. Strategic pressure read: from the sources, what ar...

[Full prompt continues for Pro members.]

Unlock the complete prompt

Pro includes the complete prompt library and every complete workflow.

View Pro options

Skill-grade setup: Access: Pro. Skill-grade: save as a Claude Project and run per account

What you provide

Source material
The account
What we sell

What you receive

Business snapshot: what they sell, to whom, how they make money, in 4 lines a rep can absorb fast
Strategic pressure read: from the sources, what are their top 2-3 pressures right now? Growth, cost, competition, regulation, transformation. Cite which source suggests each. Do...
The initiative map: what projects or priorities are visible from job postings and announcements? Job posts are strategy leaks. Read them that way.
Our value hypothesis: the ONE most credible connection between their pressure and our product, written as a testable sentence a rep could say out loud
The entry map: which roles likely own the relevant initiative, who influences them, and any visible names from the sources
Landmines: anything in the sources suggesting a bad fit, an incumbent competitor, or a timing problem. Flag honestly.
Three conversation starters that prove research without performing it

Quality checks

Rule: separate what the sources SAY from what you INFER. Mark inferences clearly. A dossier that mixes them gets a rep embarrassed on a call.