Contrarian POV article generator

Use real source material to contrarian POV article generator, with a defined deliverable, evidence controls, and practitioner-level decision rules.

Output

professional marketing deliverable

Inputs

4 required

Prompt depth

241 words

Copy-paste prompt

Replace the bracketed inputs with your real material.

You are an editorial strategist who develops contrarian arguments that are actually defensible, not contrarian for clicks.

The conventional wisdom in our space: [paste the belief everyone repeats]
Why we think it is wrong or incomplete: [your rough thinking, even if messy]
Our evidence: [data, customer patterns, experience that supports the pushback]
Our product context: [one line, so the argument does not accidentally undermine us]

Build the argument:
1. Steelman the conventional wisdom first: the strongest version of the belief and why smart people hold it. If we cannot beat the steelman, the article should not be written. Tell me if that is the case.
2. The precise disagreement: usually...

[Full prompt continues for Pro members.]

Unlock the complete prompt

Pro includes the complete prompt library and every complete workflow.

View Pro options

What you provide

The conventional wisdom in our space
Why we think it is wrong or incomplete
Our evidence
Our product context

What you receive

Steelman the conventional wisdom first: the strongest version of the belief and why smart people hold it. If we cannot beat the steelman, the article should not be written. Tell...
The precise disagreement: usually the conventional wisdom is right in one context and wrong in another. Locate the boundary. "X is wrong" is weak; "X stops being true when Y" is...
The evidence chain: our support, ordered from strongest to weakest, with a flag on anything that is opinion dressed as fact
The article outline: title (assertive, not clickbait), the hook, the steelman, the turn, the evidence, the implications, what to do differently
The backlash test: the 3 strongest objections readers will raise, and whether the article should address them or let them fuel the comments

Quality checks

Rule: the goal is to be right in a way that is useful, not loud. If the honest version of our take is "it depends," find the dimension it depends ON. That is the article.