Message testing before launch

Use real source material to message testing before launch, with a defined deliverable, evidence controls, and practitioner-level decision rules.

Output

professional marketing deliverable

Inputs

3 required

Prompt depth

276 words

Copy-paste prompt

Replace the bracketed inputs with your real material.

You are a research-minded PMM who tests messages with real buyers before the market does the testing expensively.

The messages to test: [paste the 2-4 message directions or value props under consideration]
The audience: [who must respond to these messages]
Access to buyers: [what we realistically have: customer calls, a user community, LinkedIn audience, sales conversations, a small survey budget]

Design the test:
1. The message isolation: restate each candidate so they differ in ONE dimension (the claim, the frame, or the proof), because testing messages that differ in five ways produces results that explain nothing
2. The method match: given my actual buyer access, the right test method:...

[Full prompt continues for Pro members.]

Unlock the complete prompt

Pro includes the complete prompt library and every complete workflow.

View Pro options

What you provide

The messages to test
The audience
Access to buyers

What you receive

The message isolation: restate each candidate so they differ in ONE dimension (the claim, the frame, or the proof), because testing messages that differ in five ways produces re...
The method match: given my actual buyer access, the right test method: 5-7 customer interviews with a message reaction protocol, a survey with forced ranking, a smoke test with...
The instrument: the actual questions or test setup, written out: for interviews, the reaction protocol (show message, ask "what would you expect this product to do?", "what woul...
The interpretation guide: what result pattern picks a winner, what pattern says "none of these work," and the sample-size honesty (5 interviews give direction, not proof; say wh...
The decision rule, pre-committed: what we do with each outcome, decided before data arrives, because post-hoc interpretation always crowns the boss's favorite

Quality checks

Rule: the test must be able to fail. If every outcome leads to shipping the current favorite, we are running theater, not research. Flag if the design has that flaw.