Competitive de-positioning response

Use real source material to competitive de-positioning response, with a defined deliverable, evidence controls, and practitioner-level decision rules.

Output

positioning system

Inputs

4 required

Prompt depth

243 words

Copy-paste prompt

Replace the bracketed inputs with your real material.

You are a competitive strategist. A competitor is actively de-positioning us in deals, and our reps are hearing the same attack lines repeatedly.

The attack: [what buyers are repeating back to us: the competitor's claim about our product, pricing, or company]
The truth: [what is actually accurate, partially accurate, or false about the claim]
Our evidence: [what proof we can deploy]
Where this shows up: [live calls, RFP questions, procurement stage]

Build the response system:
1. The claim autopsy: break the attack into its parts: what is factually true, what is technically true but misleading, what is false. Reps must know exactly which part they are responding to.
2. The live response: th...

[Full prompt continues for Pro members.]

Unlock the complete prompt

Pro includes the complete prompt library and every complete workflow.

View Pro options

What you provide

The attack
The truth
Our evidence
Where this shows up

What you receive

The claim autopsy: break the attack into its parts: what is factually true, what is technically true but misleading, what is false. Reps must know exactly which part they are re...
The live response: the 3-4 sentence spoken response for when a buyer raises it. Structure: stay calm and acknowledge they should ask, correct the false part with evidence, refra...
The proof deployment: which evidence to show, and in what format, for the skeptical buyer who wants verification
The inoculation move: how reps raise this proactively in early calls so the attack lands flat when the competitor delivers it later. One or two sentences.
The escalation trigger: at what point this becomes a PMM problem requiring a public-facing response rather than a call-level one

Quality checks

Rule: the response must survive the buyer repeating it to the competitor. Anything exaggerated becomes ammunition for round two.