B2B AI DirectoryB2B AI Directory
Brand & CommsadvancedPro

Build a campaign claim and evidence governance agent

Govern product, customer, market, comparative, security, regulatory, and performance claims from source evidence through campaign briefs, assets, localization, reuse, expiration, exceptions, and takedowns.

What you will have

A versioned claim register and review system with evidence quality, exact approved wording, usage scope, asset links, drift audits, exceptions, expirations, and a reusable Claude review package.

Setup time
12-20 hours
Time saved
5-10 hours per campaign asset set
Estimated cost
$40 to $300 per month
Tools used
4 tools

Why this works

Claim review becomes slow and inconsistent when every asset reopens the same evidence search and approved wording lives in email. This workflow creates atomic, versioned claims with exact scopes and links every campaign adaptation back to evidence. Claude accelerates extraction and drift detection while humans retain approval authority for product, legal, customer, security, and financial risk.

Step-by-step workflow

Preview the workflow

The first 2 steps are open. Pro unlocks the remaining steps, copy-paste prompts, pro tips, tool-by-tool setup guidance, and implementation details.

1

Define claim classes and governance authority

60-90 min

Define claim classes for product capability, performance metric, customer outcome, market statistic, competitive comparison, security, regulatory, financial, forward-looking, and opinion. Assign an approver and evidence standard to each class. Define which claims may be reused unchanged, adapted with review, or never reused outside a named asset. Record retention, expiration, and emergency takedown authority. Record the operation against stable identifiers such as claim_id, claim_class, exact_wording, source_id, evidence_quality, preserve the raw source reference and capture time, and write any transformation or decision into the system’s change history rather than replacing the prior value. Use an explicit pass, warning, or hold disposition, attach the supporting evidence IDs, and assign every unresolved exception to an owner and due date before moving to the next step.

Output

A claim-governance policy with classes, approvers, and evidence standards.

Airtable
Pro tip

Approval is contextual. A claim approved for a sales deck may not be approved for a public ad, regulated market, or named-customer campaign.

2

Build the claim register and evidence schema

2-3 hours

Create Airtable tables for Claims, Evidence Sources, Customers, Products, Regions, Channels, Assets, Approvals, Exceptions, and Supersessions. Give every claim an ID, exact approved wording, claim type, source IDs, evidence quality, owner, approval scope, geographic scope, audience, channel, expiration, prohibited adaptations, and status. Keep prior versions and link superseding claims instead of editing approved history. Add a field for the smallest defensible wording. Record the operation against stable identifiers such as claim_class, exact_wording, source_id, evidence_quality, audience_scope, preserve the raw source reference and capture time, and write any transformation or decision into the system’s change history rather than replacing the prior value. Use an explicit pass, warning, or hold disposition, attach the supporting evidence IDs, and assign every unresolved exception to an owner and due date before moving to the next step.

Output

A versioned claim and evidence register with usage scope and supersession.

Airtable
Pro tip

Store exact wording, not just a topic. Small changes such as fastest to among the fastest can materially change the evidence burden.

Pro workflow preview

Previewing 2 of 12 steps

Pro membership

Unlock the full workflow

Get the remaining 10 steps, copy-paste prompts, pro tips, tool-by-tool setup guidance, and weekly new workflows.

$9/month

Ingest current source material and approved assets
Extract atomic claims from assets and sources
Evaluate evidence quality and applicability
Approve exact claim wording and usage scope
Package the claim-review Claude Skill
Review campaign briefs before asset production
See Pro plan
3Ingest current source material and approved assets
Locked
4Extract atomic claims from assets and sources
Locked
5Evaluate evidence quality and applicability
Locked
6Approve exact claim wording and usage scope
Locked
7Package the claim-review Claude Skill
Locked
8Review campaign briefs before asset production
Locked
9Audit drafts and localized assets for claim drift
Locked
10Control exceptions and emergency takedowns
Locked
11Monitor claim reuse and upcoming expiration
Locked
12Measure governance speed and failure prevention
Locked

Expected results

Campaign review time

5-10 hours saved per asset set

Approved claim packets and automated drift review reduce repeated evidence searches and late-stage correction.

Claim traceability

Exact wording linked to source and scope

Every approved version retains evidence, qualifiers, audience, region, channel, expiration, and approver.

Risk prevention

Unsupported and expired claims blocked upstream

Brief review and asset audits surface issues before broad production or publication.

Reuse speed

Preapproved scoped variants

Teams can use known-safe wording without reopening full review, while semantic changes remain controlled.

Related workflows

Continue with workflows that share a similar GTM motion, category, or tool stack.