1
Collect competitor ads and landing pages
45-60 min
45-60 min
Start with 3-5 direct competitors. Use Google Ads Transparency Center to find active search and display ads where available, then capture screenshots, headlines, descriptions, CTAs, and destination URLs. Open each landing page and copy the hero headline, subhead, offer, proof points, pricing claim, and primary CTA into a simple spreadsheet.
Output
A competitor ad and landing page swipe file organized by company, claim, CTA, and page URL.
Google Ads Transparency CenterAdScan AI
Pro tip
Screenshot the ads and pages on the same day. Competitor ad libraries change quickly, and having a dated snapshot prevents your strategy review from turning into a moving target.
2
Pull paid keyword and SERP overlap
45-90 min
45-90 min
Use Semrush to identify the keywords your competitors are bidding on. Export paid keywords, estimated traffic, CPC, ad position, and landing page URLs. Then use Perplexity to manually check a few high-intent SERPs and note who appears repeatedly, what claims dominate, and whether the organic results frame the problem differently than the ads.
Output
A keyword overlap map showing competitor keyword focus, likely intent, CPC pressure, and SERP messaging patterns.
SemrushPerplexity
Pro tip
Do not chase every competitor keyword. Prioritize terms where the buyer is problem-aware or switching-aware, because counter-positioning works better when the searcher is already comparing options.
3
Cluster competitor claims into messaging buckets
20-30 min
20-30 min
Paste your competitor ad copy, landing page copy, and keyword notes into Claude. Ask it to cluster the market into repeated claims: cheapest, fastest, easiest, enterprise-grade, AI-powered, compliance-ready, or category-specific angles. The goal is to see where everyone sounds the same before you write a single ad.
Output
A competitor messaging map with overused claims, underused claims, and missing buyer objections.
Claude
Pro tip
Ask Claude to separate 'claimed differentiation' from 'provable differentiation.' B2B ads often claim the same vague advantages, but few pages actually back them with proof.
Prompt template
Analyze this competitor paid search dataset for the {{category}} market.
Competitor ad and landing page data:
{{competitor_ad_and_page_data}}
Paid keyword notes:
{{paid_keyword_notes}}
Output:
1. Repeated claims across competitors
2. Overused phrases that should be avoided
3. Underused buyer pains or objections
4. Competitor proof gaps
5. Search intents where we can credibly counter-position
6. 5 recommended counter-campaign angles
Be specific. Do not give generic advice like 'focus on value.'4
Choose counter-campaign angles by intent
30-45 min
30-45 min
Create 3-5 campaign angles mapped to search intent. For example, competitor comparison terms may need proof-heavy copy, while category terms may need a contrarian hook that breaks sameness. Use Claude to convert the gap analysis into campaign themes, negative keywords, landing page requirements, and ad group structure.
Output
A counter-campaign plan with ad groups, keyword themes, positioning angles, and landing page requirements.
ClaudeSemrush
Pro tip
Counter-campaigns should not always name competitors. Often the better move is to attack the category convention, such as hidden implementation costs or bloated enterprise setup.
Prompt template
Turn this competitive gap analysis into a Google Ads counter-campaign plan.
Our product:
{{product_description}}
Our strongest proof points:
{{proof_points}}
Competitive gap analysis:
{{gap_analysis}}
Keyword data:
{{keyword_data}}
Create:
- 3-5 ad groups
- Search intent for each ad group
- Primary counter-positioning angle
- Keywords to include
- Negative keywords to consider
- Landing page message required
- Risk or compliance note if any
Keep this practical enough for a paid media manager to build.5
Generate ad copy variations
30-45 min
30-45 min
Use Claude to write 8-12 responsive search ad headline options and 4-6 descriptions per ad group. Force the copy to avoid competitor clichés from the earlier analysis. Include at least one proof-led variant, one pain-led variant, one switching-cost variant, and one direct comparison variant for each ad group.
Output
Ready-to-test Google Ads headline and description variations for each counter-campaign ad group.
Claude
Pro tip
Do not let AI write only clever ads. In paid search, clarity usually beats cleverness. Use one distinctive claim, but keep the keyword intent obvious in the headline.
Prompt template
Write Google Ads copy for these counter-campaign ad groups.
Ad groups and angles:
{{ad_group_plan}}
Competitor clichés to avoid:
{{overused_phrases}}
Our proof points:
{{proof_points}}
For each ad group, write:
- 12 headlines under 30 characters where possible
- 6 descriptions under 90 characters
- 2 sitelink ideas
- 2 callout extension ideas
Include a mix of proof-led, pain-led, switching-cost, and comparison-style copy. Do not use hype words.6
Build the campaign QA checklist
30 min
30 min
Before launch, turn the strategy into a QA checklist. Confirm that each ad group has a matching landing page section, each claim has proof, and each keyword maps to one clear search intent. Add a tracking plan for CTR, search term quality, conversion rate, and competitor impression overlap.
Output
A launch-ready QA checklist and measurement plan for the counter-campaign.
ClaudeGoogle Ads Transparency Center
Pro tip
Check the search terms report after the first $300-500 in spend, not after a full month. Bad matching can burn budget before conversion data becomes meaningful.