Best for
- Teams scaling SEO without removing editorial review
- Technical marketers building agentic content systems
- Content teams that need provenance and QA at scale
Split SEO production into explicit research, SERP evidence, outline, drafting, claim checking, internal-linking, and editorial QA roles so one agent cannot quietly invent sources or push a weak draft all the way to publication.
A staged SEO production pipeline with source evidence, role-specific outputs, claim checks, editorial gates, and a QA-ready draft rather than an auto-published article.
Quick view
Check the audience, core tools, and access before you start the detailed steps.
Best for
Core tools
3 tools used across the workflow.
Access
Preview the open steps, then unlock the remaining implementation details and prompts.
Why this works
Agent pipelines only help when each stage has a narrow job and can reject bad upstream work. Separating research, structure, drafting, and QA creates checkpoints where unsupported claims, intent drift, or duplication can be stopped before they compound.
Expected results
Evidence provenance
Claims remain linked to research sources
The drafting stage cannot hide where factual material came from.
Editorial control
Human approval occurs before drafting and publication
The pipeline scales preparation without removing ownership.
Failure visibility
Missing evidence creates explicit stops
The system prefers incomplete-but-honest output over fluent fabrication.
Step-by-step workflow
The first 2 steps are open. Pro unlocks the remaining steps, copy-paste prompts, pro tips, tool-by-tool setup guidance, and implementation details.
60 min
60 min
Define target cluster, search job, audience, page type, conversion role, required first-party proof, allowed source types, prohibited claims, and editorial owner. Pull current query and ranking context from Search Console and keyword data from Semrush. Review whether a new article is actually needed before starting production. Keep the working evidence beside the output so another operator can review where each decision came from. Before moving on, run the stated check or approval gate and record any unresolved issue rather than silently smoothing it over.
A signed-off article contract and evidence policy.
The first agent should be allowed to recommend “do not create this page.”
60 min
60 min
In Claude Code, define narrow roles for SERP research, evidence collection, outline, draft, claim review, internal links, and editorial QA. Give each role an input schema, output schema, stop conditions, and forbidden behavior. Review the handoffs so later stages cannot proceed when required evidence is missing. Keep the working evidence beside the output so another operator can review where each decision came from. Before moving on, run the stated check or approval gate and record any unresolved issue rather than silently smoothing it over.
A versioned multi-agent role map with explicit handoffs.
Agents should pass structured evidence, not vague summaries.
ROLE
You are a senior B2B operator responsible for Build a multi-agent SEO content pipeline from research to QA-ready draft.
OBJECTIVE
Design a staged SEO agent pipeline
INPUTS
{{article_contract}}
{{source_rules}}
{{current_content_inventory}}
OUTPUT
Return role definitions, input and output schema for each stage, validation gate, stop condition, and human approval point.
GUARDRAILS
No role may invent citations, bypass missing evidence, or publish automatically.
Do not invent facts, metrics, quotes, identities, or source access.
UNCERTAINTY
Label missing evidence, weak samples, and conflicts instead of guessing.
HUMAN REVIEW
A named human must approve public claims, outreach, spend changes, customer-facing copy, or system-of-record updates.Pro workflow preview
Previewing 2 of 6 steps
Get the remaining 4 steps, copy-paste prompts, pro tips, tool-by-tool setup guidance, and ongoing workflow and prompt releases.
$9/month
Related workflows
Continue with workflows that share a similar GTM motion, category, or tool stack.
A keyword cluster map with intent, primary destination, supporting terms, source metrics, cannibalization checks, and content owner.
A set of source-backed keyword briefs with intent, SERP patterns, content gaps, page recommendation, proof requirements, internal-link opportunities, and human review notes.
A prioritized SEO repair backlog with evidence, business impact, effort, owners, page groups, and a clear separation between technical findings and content opportunities.