Best for
- Paid and email campaigns with high traffic but weak conversion
- Teams comparing multiple landing pages or creative variants
- B2B organizations that need to separate traffic quality from page quality
Compare campaign traffic, landing-page engagement, CTA behavior, form progression, key events, and segment quality to identify pages that attract clicks but fail to create useful demand.
A landing-page quality scorecard, evidence-backed issue classification, and prioritized page remediation plan.
Quick view
Check the audience, core tools, and access before you start the detailed steps.
Best for
Core tools
2 tools used across the workflow.
Access
Preview the open steps, then unlock the remaining implementation details and prompts.
Why this works
Landing pages are often judged on conversion rate without considering channel mix, device, intent, or event quality. This workflow creates comparable cohorts and checks the entire page-to-form sequence. Claude labels the likely issue and uncertainty while the campaign owner approves the remediation plan.
Expected results
Audit coverage
100% of the approved in-scope population
The workflow begins with a frozen scope and reconciles the analyzed row count to the platform control report, so coverage can be verified rather than estimated.
Evidence traceability
Every approved finding linked to a source evidence key
The data dictionary and evidence-key convention require each factual conclusion to point to a specific record, field, and as-of date.
Controlled execution
No source-system change without recorded approval and rollback data
Recommendations, approvals, and writes are separated into different steps, with pre-change exports and pilot validation before broader application.
Reusable operating cadence
A repeatable weekly during active campaigns review system
The Claude Skill, rule register, acceptance tests, run manifest, and closeout process turn the work into a maintained operating system rather than a one-time analysis.
Step-by-step workflow
The first 2 steps are open. Pro unlocks the remaining steps, copy-paste prompts, pro tips, tool-by-tool setup guidance, and implementation details.
30-45 min
30-45 min
Write a one-page operating charter for campaign landing-page quality and downstream conversion behavior before exporting any data. State the exact decision this workflow supports: which landing pages need message, UX, targeting, or tracking changes. Define the in-scope business units, pipelines, regions, date window, record types, and exclusions, then name one analysis owner, one Google Analytics 4 data owner, and one final approver. Record the review cadence as weekly during active campaigns and specify where evidence, approvals, and exceptions will be stored. Review the charter with the approver and do not proceed until the scope and decision rights are accepted.
An approved operating charter with scope, owners, cadence, and decision rights.
A narrow decision produces better analysis than a broad request to “find insights”; keep out-of-scope questions in a separate backlog.
45-75 min
45-75 min
Convert the operating policy into a rule register that can be checked against GA4 events and dimensions. Create one row per rule with rule_id, rule_name, business_reason, required_fields, calculation_or_test, pass_condition, exception_code, severity, owner, and policy_version. Start with these minimum checks: UTM values are normalized, landing-page cohorts use the same date window, campaign traffic is not mixed with unrelated organic sessions, CTA and form events fire once per intended action, and low-volume pages are not ranked as winners prematurely. Give every rule an example that should pass and an example that should fail so reviewers interpret it consistently. Have the business owner approve the rule register and record any unresolved policy questions before data is scored.
A versioned rule register with pass conditions, examples, severity, and exception codes.
Version the rules independently from the workflow; changing a threshold should not erase which policy produced an earlier decision.
Pro workflow preview
Previewing 2 of 16 steps
Get the remaining 14 steps, copy-paste prompts, pro tips, tool-by-tool setup guidance, and ongoing workflow and prompt releases.
$9/month
Related workflows
Continue with workflows that share a similar GTM motion, category, or tool stack.
A prioritized conversion-leak backlog with reproducible GA4 evidence, test hypotheses, and measurement requirements.
A content-assist map, journey-role taxonomy, and prioritized refresh or linking backlog tied to observable conversion paths.
A measurement defect register, severity-ranked remediation backlog, and recurring event-QA protocol.