Best for
- B2B advertisers generating cheap leads that sales rejects
- Teams importing qualified lead or opportunity outcomes into Google Ads
- Organizations optimizing toward multiple conversion actions
Distinguish inexpensive form fills from sales-usable demand using search terms, campaign structure, landing pages, conversion actions, values, and imported downstream outcomes available in Google Ads.
A quality-to-pipeline scorecard, optimization-risk diagnosis, and approved campaign action plan.
Quick view
Check the audience, core tools, and access before you start the detailed steps.
Best for
Core tools
2 tools used across the workflow.
Access
Preview the open steps, then unlock the remaining implementation details and prompts.
Why this works
Google Ads can optimize efficiently toward the wrong outcome when every conversion is treated as equal. This workflow evaluates query intent, conversion action, value, lag, and downstream quality signals available in the platform. Claude identifies patterns and risks, while bidding or budget changes remain human-approved.
Expected results
Audit coverage
100% of the approved in-scope population
The workflow begins with a frozen scope and reconciles the analyzed row count to the platform control report, so coverage can be verified rather than estimated.
Evidence traceability
Every approved finding linked to a source evidence key
The data dictionary and evidence-key convention require each factual conclusion to point to a specific record, field, and as-of date.
Controlled execution
No source-system change without recorded approval and rollback data
Recommendations, approvals, and writes are separated into different steps, with pre-change exports and pilot validation before broader application.
Reusable operating cadence
A repeatable weekly or biweekly review system
The Claude Skill, rule register, acceptance tests, run manifest, and closeout process turn the work into a maintained operating system rather than a one-time analysis.
Step-by-step workflow
The first 2 steps are open. Pro unlocks the remaining steps, copy-paste prompts, pro tips, tool-by-tool setup guidance, and implementation details.
30-45 min
30-45 min
Write a one-page operating charter for paid-search lead quality and downstream pipeline signals before exporting any data. State the exact decision this workflow supports: which campaigns, queries, conversion actions, and bidding inputs should be scaled, corrected, limited, or investigated. Define the in-scope business units, pipelines, regions, date window, record types, and exclusions, then name one analysis owner, one Google Ads data owner, and one final approver. Record the review cadence as weekly or biweekly and specify where evidence, approvals, and exceptions will be stored. Review the charter with the approver and do not proceed until the scope and decision rights are accepted.
An approved operating charter with scope, owners, cadence, and decision rights.
A narrow decision produces better analysis than a broad request to “find insights”; keep out-of-scope questions in a separate backlog.
45-75 min
45-75 min
Convert the operating policy into a rule register that can be checked against Google Ads campaigns, search terms, assets, and conversion actions. Create one row per rule with rule_id, rule_name, business_reason, required_fields, calculation_or_test, pass_condition, exception_code, severity, owner, and policy_version. Start with these minimum checks: primary and secondary conversions are separated, conversion values reflect approved business meaning, search-term and campaign data use the same date and attribution settings, offline imports are monitored for delay and coverage, and small downstream samples are not used for aggressive bidding changes. Give every rule an example that should pass and an example that should fail so reviewers interpret it consistently. Have the business owner approve the rule register and record any unresolved policy questions before data is scored.
A versioned rule register with pass conditions, examples, severity, and exception codes.
Version the rules independently from the workflow; changing a threshold should not erase which policy produced an earlier decision.
Pro workflow preview
Previewing 2 of 16 steps
Get the remaining 14 steps, copy-paste prompts, pro tips, tool-by-tool setup guidance, and ongoing workflow and prompt releases.
$9/month
Related workflows
Continue with workflows that share a similar GTM motion, category, or tool stack.
A search-term classification ledger, negative-keyword candidates with match guidance, and a monitored change set.
A conversion-action governance ledger, bidding-risk assessment, and approved remediation plan.
An approval-ready budget and structure change plan with scenario assumptions, guardrails, and monitoring checkpoints.